The Clinton Foundation Case Study Hearing, Panel Two: The Clowns Morph into the Joker

[To begin, a slight correction:  In my first report of panel one, I misrepresented Mr. Fitton of Judicial Watch as an attorney.  He is not.  He is the President of Judicial Watch, founded in 1994 to advocate and serve as a watchdog to D.C. politics and the laws of the land.]

The circus began almost immediately with the clown Rep. Connolly tossing the colorful balls of denial referring to the upcoming panel as “so-called set of allegations”, in which he asserts the witnesses have “conceded they are NOT whistleblowers.  Instead they are would-be plaintiffs in a lawsuit.”  This would be a funny sideshow and all if the clowns hadn’t taken themselves so seriously as to insist everyone else should take their act seriously.  These assertions were reiterated two or three more times over the course of the almost three hour hearing, much to the dismay of the witnesses who were very plain about who they were and what their roles were.  But I’ll get to that shortly.

[You can get a lot of the outline details from other sources, so I hate to spend my limited words on those issues.  But I’ll give a brief overview and encourage people interested in the fine details to read the articles I cited in part one, and watch the actual hearing.]

Panel two, consisted of witnesses Mr. Lawrence Doyle and John Moynihan of MDA Analytics, LLC.  They are forensic investigators who made a point of making sure we knew they were Jesuits.  I’m not sure why they thought that was important to know and be known, but they were proud of that fact, and I don’t have time to get into that right now.

Their actual function in this case, (in layman’s terms), are financial bounty hunters (in this case to the IRS).  This gets particularly amusing if you want to just watch this excerpt it begins at 2:25 (that’s two hours, 25 minutes in).  The clowns have been in the circus so long, they are having trouble understanding real life terms from the real world and not the circus.  Either they’re trying to trap the witnesses into denouncing their whistleblower status, or they really don’t understand.  They (Clown Rep. Holmes Norton at this point) also keep trying to paint the witnesses as plaintiffs in a fictional court lawsuit that doesn’t exist.  Mr. Moynihan goes through this explanation once more to try to help the clowns with real life understanding. 

Moynihan showed great restraint, but his frustration had to be greater.  Especially because an hour earlier in the hearing, you can quote him as saying:  “We do not have a lawsuit against anybody.  We don’t have a complaint against anybody.  We have a submission of probable cause to the IRS.”  Just an hour earlier in his introduction he had explained that they had filed a tax claim of probable cause to the IRS indicating the Clinton Foundation operated outside its bounds of approval as a 501(c)3. 

I really want to get into my amusement at the clown politicians trying to make the real life activity of a real life investigation into a circus act, but I’ll run out of time doing that.  For now, the nuts and bolts of the real life investigation are worthy of mention.

The witnesses spent two years going through Clinton Foundation public records they could access.  They went through 990s, returns filed, revenue sources and expenses.  They ran into a problem when they couldn’t reconcile the CF revenue sources with their expenses.  They did a macro review of CF donors and found that less than one-tenth of one percent of donors gave 80% of the CF money.  They looked at consent decrees issued against the CF and reviewed the responses.  They sourced contracts, MOUs, emails and interaction with foreign governments.  They reviewed foreign offices, and they created spreadsheets comparing the data. 

They found massive tax fraud.  This is the function of a tax bounty hunter, and it comes under legal definition as “outside whistleblowers” – meaning they didn’t work for the CF, but are on the outside blowing the whistle on illegal activities.  For some reason, the clowns couldn’t understand these terms or functions.

The whistleblowers encapsulated their conclusions in the following four points, and these are verbatim:

  • FOREIGN AGENT.  The Foundation began acting as an agent of foreign governments in its early life and has continued doing so throughout its existence.  As such, the Foundation should have registered on the FARA.  Ultimately the Foundation and its auditors acknowledged this fact and conceded in formal submissions that it did operate as an agent.  Therefore the Foundation is not entitled to 501(c)3 tax-exempt privileges as outlined in IRS 170c2.
  • MISREPRESENTATIONS:  The CF did not comply with the requirements of 501(c)3 in that it far exceeded the purposes detailed in its original Articles of Incorporation filed Dec. 23, 1997 and subsequently reaffirmed in numerous other records across many jurisdictions, including with NARA.  The Foundation did pursue programs and activities for which it had neither sought nor achieved permission to undertake.  Such was the case even before the completion of the Presidential Library in 2004.  As such, representation by the Foundation to donors was a misrepresentation of the approval organizational tax status allowing it to raise funds for the Presidential Library and related programs therein.  In these pursuits the Foundation failed the organizational and operational tests 501(c)3 Internal Revenue Code 7.25.3.
  • THE INTENTIONAL MISUSE OF DONATED PUBLIC FUNDS:  The Foundation falsely attested that it received funds and used them for charitable purposes, which was in fact not the case.  Rather, the Foundation pursued an array of activities both domestically and abroad.  Some may be deemed philanthropic, albeit unimproved, while others much larger in scope, are properly characterized as profit-oriented and taxable undertakings of private enterprise.  Again, failing the operational tests from philanthropy referenced above.  The investigation clearly demonstrates that the Foundation was not a charitable organization, per se, but in point of fact was a closely held family partnership.  As such it was governed in a fashion in which it sought in large measure to advance the personal interests of its principles as detailed within the financial analysis of this submission, and further confirmed within the supporting documentation and evidence section.
  • DONORS RESPONSIBILITIES:  The private foundations that donated to the Clinton Foundation are themselves subject to tax payments on the donations they made to the Foundation under Code IRC 4945 unless they meet specific conditions as outlined in IRS Code 72719582.

Besides the obvious and blatant disregard for the law by the Clintons and their “foundation”, we have implications of treasonous acts:  selling our country and favors of our country to the highest bidder.  And Congress, I mean the clowns, don’t see a reason for investigation??  If you or I did even a fraction of what has occurred here, we would have already been executed for treason or imprisoned for our lifetime! 

It was pointed out at the beginning of the hearing that neither the IRS nor US Attorney John Huber attended the hearing, though both were requested to be there.  Attorney General Jeff Sessions had appointed John Huber to investigate alleged wrongdoings of the Clinton Foundation and some of the clowns were sorely bothered that he declined to attend the hearing.

It’s not until two hours and ten minutes into the hearing that we get the bombshell that the CF is being investigated for criminal activity.  Per interviews with CF’s CFO Andy Kessel in November 2016, the witnesses were told the CF co-mingled funds on a “regular and ongoing basis”.  Kessel also informed the witnesses that the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) had assets of $900M and treated it as a piggy bank.  CHAI was never IRS approved, and apparently Bill Clinton and Bill Gates separated over this issue.

It’s also interesting to note that our whistleblowers submitted their probable cause to the IRS on August 11, 2017, and it was denied.  They submitted 1300 pages of documentation in a 48 page claim submission with 95 formal exhibits and 6000 pages of accompanying documentation.  The IRS denied this claim, but gave no reason for its denial.  (if I understood that right)  The whistleblowers appealed the denial with additional evidence.  The evidence they submitted to accompany their appeal were pictures of the FBI loading 757s of confiscated evidence in Little Rock, Arkansas from the Clinton Foundation.

It was at this realization that Chairman Meadows had a lightbulb go on and realized Attorney Huber could not attend the hearing because he cannot comment on an ongoing investigation.  The Clinton Foundation is under criminal investigation with the FBI.  Perhaps the FBI and powers that be are not ready for that information to be divulged…

Now there are a lot more things that need to be discussed about what came out at this hearing.  Things like the 2010 Uranium One controversy where money was funneled into the CF through Mr. Frank Giustra and hidden from the American people.  Things like Giustra/Uranium One interests gave the CF $31.3M in January 2008.  Other things like Uranium One’s Chairman used his family’s foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35M to the Clinton Foundation, and that Bill Clinton shortly thereafter received a $500,000 speaking fee from Ren. Cap. Org., or that they received $18-50M from the Saudi’s.  Or especially that the Justice Department actively suppressed the investigations.  Or even things like they found the Clinton email server…. But I’m going to pass over those things for right now and highlight the thing that was exposed and probably bothers me the most.

When you’re at the circus and the clowns want audience participation and they engage in their clown-like activities, sometimes participants don’t fall for their antics.  It’s especially amusing because it throws a kink in the act.  This is what happened when the (circus) clowns began chastising the whistleblower investigators (rooted in reality) about their need to disclose all of their findings – all six thousand pages.  They then pulled out their super inflated air hammer and begin shaking it at them when they accused the whistle blowers of using the circus for their own benefit.  (somewhere around 2:22 in)

All of a sudden the clowns “need” the whistle blowers information to “do the proper oversight” that they’re “responsible” for.  Now?  After all these years they could have looked into it themselves?  And they pulled out their inflatable super-sized hammer to make sure these people in the real world knew they were important people and not to be ignored!  You must give us your information!  (That we otherwise have been uninterested or unwilling to get ourselves.)

This was promptly interrupted when Mr. Moynihan pointed out, “You invited us; we didn’t invite ourselves.”  Meaning:  Dude!  What we’re doing has nothing to do with you and we didn’t come to you to “tell on the bad guys”.  You called us in when you found out we were telling on the bad guys!

The clowns tried to make sure Mr. Moynihan saw the hammer by reiterating they “need the documents to perform”!  Mr. Moynihan tried to bring real life realities back into the ring by stating, “Let me be very clear, you invited us.  We told the staff members, if you didn’t want to invite us, then disinvite us!”  (It was never the investigators purpose to bring real life to the circus.  Their purpose was to apply real life consequences to real life actions.)

Those of us who don’t work for the circus know what’s going on here:  there has been corruption from key circus employees for years now, and the circus just hasn’t cared enough to clean it up (or maybe they were benefiting from it?).   People on the outside of the circus are tired of waiting for the circus to clean up their act and are doing their own investigations.  Now that someone outside the circus has brought light on it, the circus wants to make sure they’re looking like they care and need to get to the bottom of it.

In fact, the clown injects into this dialogue at this point that he knows “there’s a game going on here”.  Yes!  There is!  Some of the circus needs to pretend they’re interested in illegal circus acts, and they have to act like they care because someone on the outside is shedding light on it.  But they don’t really care, because they’re not really going to do anything about it, as the panel one debacle proved. 

This is all leads up to the coup de grace that I’m afraid the clowns and circus acts just don’t understand.  And I feel sorry for some of these clowns because I think a few of them have a sincere desire to accost the corruption and expose the acts that are undermining the circus, but they just haven’t figured out yet that they’re employees of the circus and, well, the show must go on.

I think the revelations of the defiance of circus agencies that are supposed to be honest but really are not, are starting to hit some of the clowns at this point in the hearing.  They’re simply befuddled when they find out that these witnesses with these 6000 pages of evidence have sent letters and evidence to our Department of Justice multiple times with no interest.  They sent this data to the DOJ April 14, 18 and 29, then again May 29 with no reply.  They FedExed data again on October 10, (received it Oct. 12).  Then on November 30 (two weeks before the hearing), the DOJ office called and asked for the data AGAIN.  The DOJ asked the witnesses to RESUBMIT what they had sent them three times prior. 

Where did the evidence go those other times???  Did the DOJ lose it?  Or did they “lose” it?  These are important questions that need answered if we’re at all interested in truth and justice.  The financial investigators have spent three years researching and compiling their findings of extreme corruption with national implications and the governmental agencies responsible for acting have refused to process it.  The investigators had shared their materials with various US Attorney agencies, the Federal US Postal Inspection Service, and various jurisdictions of “authorities” at both state and federal levels that could actually enforce the law, to no avail.  No one is interested in upholding the law when it comes to political power figures. 

At this point in the hearing the head clown pulled out the super biggest inflatable hammer and he’s mad!  He’s red in the face and his voice has risen to clear frustrated levels.  He reprimands these investigators as sharing all of this evidence with all of these people, but they are unwilling to share it (in its entirety) with Congress – the hammer is dropped on their heads.  And then the coup de gras comes from the witnesses, (and you can watch it yourself at 2:38), “Are you going to prosecute the Clintons?  Are you going to bring an action against the Clintons that would yield us economic consortium?”  The hammer had no effect on this non-circus-participator!  Because those who in live in reality already know that those in the circus are impotent at enforcing the laws.  It doesn’t happen.  It won’t happen.

The head clown is furious and chides this non-participator in circus antics to not “get cute with me!”  The clown accuses him of that which the circus is actually guilty, not being about the rule of law and justice.  If ever the pot has called the kettle black, this is that time. 

Mr. Moynihan responds with the succinct truth, of which we’d all do well to pay attention to:  “That’s why we presented to law enforcement agencies which you’re not.”

With that the circus wrapped up. 

But let the audience be aware and know without shadow of doubt:  the circus is just a circus.  They are unable or unwilling or uninterested or un-whatever in actually upholding the laws of our land and executing justice.  When you’re not a participant in the circus, it’s really clear to see. 

And that, ladies and gentleman, is probably why the crimes of circus employees will probably never see the gavel of justice.

One thought on “The Clinton Foundation Case Study Hearing, Panel Two: The Clowns Morph into the Joker”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.