Part Two

On the topic of Israel, I’m not sure where to start. It’s a big topic, so let’s start with some definitions.

HEBREWS…. Until (King) David killed Goliath, the descendants of Abraham were referenced in the Bible as Hebrews, and were known to the onlooking world as Hebrews. (Why? Why weren’t they called Abrahamites or some other derivative?)

The identifier “Hebrew” comes from Eber, the descendant of Shem. (I learned this from Steve Collins.) So for hundreds and hundreds of years, the descendants of Shem through Eber were known as Hebrews.

[Eber was the great grandson of Shem. Abraham would come six generations from Eber, and nine from Shem.]

SEMITE…. Shem is one of the three sons of Noah, and is where we get the term Semite. Shem, being one of three progenitors of humanity, would mean roughly a third of humanity would be Semites.

ISRAEL/ISRAELITE…. The first reference to Israel (and Israelites) is in Leviticus, or the time after the Exodus. Even in Egypt the descendants of Abraham were known as Hebrews. In 1Samuel you’ll read that the Philistines referred to the descendants as Hebrews. After (not yet King) David killed Goliath, you don’t see the word Hebrew again except for once in Acts (6:1) and twice by Paul (2Cor. 11:22, Phil. 3:5).

Consider the book of Hebrews in the New Testament and the content and themes of that book: the deity and sovereignty of Christ; the inferiority of the law and the superiority of the new covenant; the superiority of the blood of Christ (over the blood of animals and even the martyrs); the superiority of the priesthood of Christ (over the Levitical priests and Melchizadek); the superiority of the heavenly Jerusalem over the earthly one, the heavenly Mount Zion over the earthly Mount Sinai, the heavenly kingdom over an earthly kingdom…. Isn’t it interesting that the book that spells out the superiority of the new covenant in Christ is addressed to the ancient bloodline heirs of Eber, the great grandson of Shem? The word “Hebrew(s)” is not to be found in the entirety of the book, and yet it was specifically titled as such.

As you probably know, Abraham had Isaac. Isaac had Jacob who was renamed Israel, and his twelve sons made up the people group come to be known as the Israelites. They eventually lost the name of Hebrews in common vernacular.

JUDAH… There were three kings of Israel before Israel split. Under King Solomon’s heir, King Rehoboam, the nation of Israel was split from the twelve tribes of Jacob. The ten tribes of the north were known as Israel, with Samaria as its capital. The two tribes of the south were known as Judah with Jerusalem as its capital. Jerusalem was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzer in 587 B.C. and its people went into captivity.

JEW(S)…. You first see the word Jew in Esther, and the term Jews in 2Kings 25 at the time Nebuchadnezzar was ruling over the conquered land of Judah. Jew(s) is a term for one from the country of Judah (nationality) or from the tribe of Judah (bloodline).

By the time Christ came onto the scene, the ten tribes of Israel were scattered abroad (well into Europe by now), and only the remnant of Judah remained in the ancient land of Judah and the city of Jerusalem.

The scattered Israelites traveled over the Caucasus Mountains (dividing western Asia and Eastern Europe between the Black Sea and Caspian Sea). They were unknown to the people in that region at that time and so the people nicknamed them Caucasians. They were an enormous people group. They split up (mostly by tribes and families) and scattered across Europe (and other places), and yes, to the islands of Ireland and modern day UK. (All of this is so fascinating and can be studied in Steve Collins’ work.) I’m leaving a lot of details out, but I’m trying to focus on names of people groups right now.

By the time Christ arrived on the scene, the only people of the Israelite bloodlines in the land were mostly Jews (of the tribe or nation of Judah, also of the tribe of Benjamin, but would be considered Jews by historic nationality).

The reason I point all of this out is because the names are convoluted in both the church and media. Modern day Israel was formed for the Jews, not Israelites. The Jews are but one tribe (or two if you count Benjamin) of the ancient Israelites. Modern day Israel was formed as a homeland for displaced Jews, not Israelites. It’s a misnomer.

ANTI-SEMITE…. When modern day Jews, media and everyone else cries “Anti-Semite”, by definition that means “anti-Shem”. The descendants of Shem make up roughly one third of the earth’s population. Yet “anti-Semite” has come to mean criticism of anyone with a Jewish name or claim.

I just want to make this clear because it’s really not.

To complicate matters more, the modern “Jews” are more or less NOT from the ancient bloodlines and nation of Judah. The population of Jewry is minuscule in the scope of the world’s population.

KHAZARIA…. I wrote a paper on a people group from ancient Khazaria who adopted Judaism almost seven hundred years after Christ was on the earth. The Khazarians were primarily of Turkish and Mongol descent. I wrote about it in this article, so I won’t get into the details here.

( https://www.eternalissues.com/?p=170 )

Fast forward to save time, that people group (Khazarians) would later become linked to the Bolshevik revolution, the execution of the Czars of Russia, the Marxist and Communist revolutions, and were injected into America’s governmental infrastructure, just to name a few.

In a letter to Jewish scholar and foreign secretary of Spain, Hasdai ibn Shaprut, the Khazarian King Joseph boasted that their people (Khazarians) descended from the family of Togarma, the son of Japheth. [Togarma represents all Turkic peoples.] So the Khazar “Jews” aren’t even Semites.

GOG/MAGOG…. In multiple ancient texts the Khazars were known as the “sons of Magog”, and the land of Khazaria as the land of Gog and Magog.

UKRAINE…. Where was ancient Khazaria? The ancient land of Khazaria is modern day Ukraine.

There’s extensive research in numerous places tracing the Khazarians from their ancient land to the various places they migrated. I won’t get into that here, though I’ve already made some references.

The ancient people of Khazaria moved throughout history in subversive roles. (There is so much research on this. Start with Koestler’s book and move on from there.) They adopted the title of Jews and inserted into a number of nations and people groups.

They first settled in Poland, and later culminated in Germany as well. (Koestler gets into this.) There are a number of actual Jews who decried this people group. American Jew Benjamin Freedman’s famous 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel can be read here,

http://highlanderjuan.com/…/Benjamin-H-Freedman-Speech…

or listened to here

https://archive.org/…/benjamin-h.-freedman-speech…

I’m going to skip a lot of history, testimony, and World Wars I and II drama for now – but it matters. So we can circle back to it later, or you can and should research it yourself.

Allegedly there are fourteen million Jews in the world. That’s 0.2% of the entire world population. Is it odd to anyone else that “anti-Semite” has become a global talking point? [Comparatively, allegedly there are 2.2 billion Christians (or 31.5% of the world population, almost a third of the world), and 1.9 billion Muslims (or 25% of the world population, a fourth of the world). Fifteen percent are Hindu and 6.6% are Buddhist. Seven percent are atheist.]

How is 0.2% of the world population dominating the world talking points? (And don’t even start me on the number of Jews that own/run the media, Hollywood, banks, etc. How did “anti-Semite” come to mean “anti-Jew”?)

WHY did it come to mean anti-Jew? WHEN did it come to mean anti-Jew? How did one third (Shem bloodline) of the world come to be narrowed down to 0.2% (Jew)?

[You may think I’m oversimplifying it. You may argue that they just use “anti-Semitic” because the Jews spoke/speak Hebrew (a Semitic language). But Arabic is a Semitic language and there are 3.4% of the world that speak it, and anti-Semitic doesn’t refer to Arabs. In fact, more than 330 million people in the world speak a form of Semitic language. I don’t think it has to do with language, even if they “say” it does.]

I think all of these terms have been convoluted to force a narrative and an agenda. The same people who have been used to help the enemy deceive the world, have hijacked the Word of God to create a narrative that’s a twisting of the pure and original word and intent. “Did God really say?” Look at how the enemy has worked throughout Biblical history, the one we have a written record of. It has always been about subverting the word of God.

If there’s a people group intent on leading the world into a globalist agenda, who would be their greatest adversary? Who would be their greatest threat? A people who follow God, not man. The enemy has very little difficulty deceiving those not interested in walking with God. Who would push back on a system that leads humanity into bondage, into serving man and man’s systems? A people who serve and follow God. The Israelites showed us that over and over.

How can you bring your enemy into your camp? By deceiving him/her to think it’s their camp.

How could the enemy bring God’s people into his plan? By deceiving them to think it’s God’s plan.

If we will know them by their fruit, then look at modern Israel’s fruit.

I’m telling you, the religious spirit is cunning. It masquerades as works and words of God, but it twists them. It misrepresents them.

Let me put it this way, if the prophecies have long been fulfilled, if Christ has ruled and reigned, if the devil has been loosed to deceive the nations, what would that look like? We can only best guess, I get that. But best guess it. What would it look like? Would the devil be able to deceive a people who sat under the peaceful and righteous reign of Christ? How could he? Yet the prophecy says he will.

I’ll get into that in my next post, but I’ll tell you this. I think he would keep the children of God occupied, distracted and in fear, by putting the prophecies back out into the future. How could he do that if they were already fulfilled? He’d have to hide their fulfillment to some extent. Wouldn’t projecting Israel as the apple of God’s eye be the best place in the WHOLE WORLD to hide??? If we thought it was the sacred ground, wouldn’t we do exactly what we (institutional church) are doing now? Side with the corrupt politicians and bankers and war cartels to support said people in the name of our religion?

Why is the center of America’s money laundering in Ukraine? Why is it replete with human trafficking, organ harvesting, bioweapons, etc. and why does modern day Ukraine have ancient Khazaria’s crest on their flag??? If Revelation 20:8 is cryptic (and it is), what in the world does “Gog and Magog” mean in the middle of the Satan-deceiving-the-nations sentence?? There’s literally NOTHING else like it in the whole book.

The book of Revelation is chiastic. It’s an ancient Hebrew form of writing where it makes a pattern, then reverses the pattern and repeats it. This part (20:8) is not repeated anywhere else.

Don’t judge my theory yet. I’m just getting started. I have a lot more to say. This is just the beginning. Start looking at some of the resources I’ve given here and in the prior post. I’ll hit some more points in the next post.